 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 16 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
AmirMortal
|
Post subject: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:05 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:28 pm Posts: 6419 Location: The outskirts of the Milky Way
|
[Not really sure where this sort of thing fits within our category system, and anything that goes into GD gets quickly burried.]So tonight I came to a realization about why revolvers have never really garnered my affections. If I hold my hand in a loose fist naturally and draw an imaginary line across my first two knuckles, that line would be almost exactly perpendicular to my wrist and forearm. If I insert most semi-autos into that fist those knuckles don't change their angle much, if at all. In the case of my CZ82 and my PF9, with their grip angles being almost identical, any change in the angle of my hand in a vertical plane is imperceptible as I grip the pistol with the sights on target. This means that my hand is still being held in a natural position, at a natural angle; the same angle that my hand will naturally revert to when at rest. Now, contrast that with gripping a revolver, at least for me. If I grip a DA revolver using only my thumb and middle finger, and hold my hand in the position described above, the bore is roughly 30* high from my imaginary (sighting down extented pointer finger) POA. Meaning that in order for me to put the sights on target, I have to effectively aim my shooting hand down ~30*. Anyway, food for thought. I know those of you who are Devotes of The Cylinder are likely to stay that way, but I've seen some befuddlement when some of us express our view that while the relics have their place (in museums...), that they are not the be all, end all IMnsHO. I actually feel similarly about the old rotary PS: As I was typing this I realized tht the 30-45 degrees low hold in the wrist is pretty standard when gripping a sword with thumb and index finger, which I've never had any problems with. Either way, I just don't find the old-style rotary type handguns to be as comfortable in my hand as an auto. Rotary phones are pretty cool too, and I can understand why someone would collect them, but they are not my first choice when I need a phone anymore.  :ducking for cover: PPS: And yes, I felt this way before the broken wrist, and the apparent tendonitis. 
_________________ “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Fukshot
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:17 am |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:42 am Posts: 8929
|
|
What size are your hands? Big? Small?
Current stock grips on double actions do the same for me. The correct grip for my hand makes holding completely natural.
_________________ I know the things I know, and I do the things I do; and if you do not like me so, to hell, my love, with you!
-Dorothy Parker
Join the LGC
|
|
| Top |
|
|
AmirMortal
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:28 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:28 pm Posts: 6419 Location: The outskirts of the Milky Way
|
Fukshot wrote: What size are your hands? Big? Small?
Current stock grips on double actions do the same for me. The correct grip for my hand makes holding completely natural. I usually end up wearing L sized gloves, but my hands aren't monstrous.
_________________ “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
| Top |
|
|
troutkiller
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:42 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:09 am Posts: 492 Location: Round on the ends, hi in the middle
|
|
Interesting observation about the effective grip angle, Amir. I shoot both semi-autos and revolvers, with any revolver getting a new grip, which helps. The two things I find so different about revolvers are a higher bore axis and the trigger. Revolvers ride high in the hand thus a different balance to the weapon.
DA revolver triggers vary of course from mfg'er to mfg'er, but they are generally long with appropriately long resets. Smiths have a very nice trigger compared to other revolvers I've tried. And in fact, the PF9's trigger reminds me quite a bit of a revolver: long pull, long reset. Very different triggers compared to the striker-fired semis.
_________________ "Kill the white people" ~ Tyrone Green (Eddie Murphy)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
punkinlobber
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:56 am |
|
| I can't believe you post this much! |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 6:48 pm Posts: 1066
|
|
I love them all. I adapt. I overcome.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
AmirMortal
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:12 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:28 pm Posts: 6419 Location: The outskirts of the Milky Way
|
troutkiller wrote: Interesting observation about the effective grip angle, Amir. I shoot both semi-autos and revolvers, with any revolver getting a new grip, which helps. The two things I find so different about revolvers are a higher bore axis and the trigger. Revolvers ride high in the hand thus a different balance to the weapon.
DA revolver triggers vary of course from mfg'er to mfg'er, but they are long with appropriately long resets. Smiths have a very nice trigger compared to other revolvers I've tried. And in fact, the PF9's trigger reminds me quite a bit of a revolver: long pull, long reset. Very different triggers compared to the striker-fired semis. +1) Absofuckinglutely!2) I think you're right. 3) who cares? 4) I think you're wrong. 5) You be Illin'! I've put over 1k rds through mine, and it's been dry fired (using snap caps) double, maybe triple that number of times easily. Quite smooth these days, and still only ~5lbs but with about 3/4" or so of travel in the trigger. Very reminiscent of the S&W I grew up with, but it's less than 9/10" thick, and weighs about 1/3 loaded of what my Pop's M10 snubby weighs empty. Oh, and it's got 2 more rounds. and it's comfortable. Did I mention .88" thick with 8rds 9mm at right about a pound? Dropped into a decent IWB I have only minimal trouble concealing in a t-shirt and shorts; it just disappears with no unsightly lumps or bulges. Any trouble I do have is due to short shirts. If I use the IWB holster that Irishman made for me for small of the back carry, I don't even have to let my belt out a single notch. There's a slight gap where my belt line crosses my spine, and that little pistol just drops right in there quite comfortably.
_________________ “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
| Top |
|
|
MtnMan
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:38 am |
|
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 9:08 pm Posts: 1497 Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
|
Fukshot wrote: Current stock grips on double actions do the same for me. The correct grip for my hand makes holding completely natural. And therein lies the reason why revolvers are ergonomically superior: infinitely customizable grip sizes and shapes. The modern* autoloading pistol grip, serving primarily as a magazine well, is inherently compromised as a handhold, particularly in the case of those double stack abominations. Yeah, OK, after 100 years, a few manufacturers figured out how to add or subtract a fraction of an inch with interchangeable plastic bitsies. Actually, my SP2022 (with the small girly hands backstrap) is pretty comfortable, as far as holding a box of ammo goes. And some single stack autos approach sweetness. But revolvers are still the best. Now that that that's off my chest, I'm suddenly curious to find an old rotary phone and see if it will work with my digital cable phone service. *Broomhandle Mausers excepted.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
ErikO
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:17 am |
|
| I can't believe you post this much! |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 10:49 pm Posts: 9033 Location: St Louis, Missouri
|
|
Personally, autos point better for me than pistols. I can blame tha on the radial break I suffered in my strong wrist a few years back. Before that I had no issues with either.
I still prefer long arms.
_________________ http://armedliberalinmo.blogspot.com/ Bowers v. DeVito "...there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered." Director of Merchandising, The Liberal Gun Club Happy Donater to the HRC
|
|
| Top |
|
|
AmirMortal
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:25 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:28 pm Posts: 6419 Location: The outskirts of the Milky Way
|
ErikO wrote: Personally, autos point better for me than pistols. I can blame tha on the radial break I suffered in my strong wrist a few years back. Before that I had no issues with either.
I still prefer long arms. Don't say that, it's only been 5wks for my Ulnar.
_________________ “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
| Top |
|
|
ErikO
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:32 am |
|
| I can't believe you post this much! |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 10:49 pm Posts: 9033 Location: St Louis, Missouri
|
AmirMortal wrote: ErikO wrote: Personally, autos point better for me than pistols. I can blame tha on the radial break I suffered in my strong wrist a few years back. Before that I had no issues with either.
I still prefer long arms. Don't say that, it's only been 5wks for my Ulnar. My injury healed before I could get it really looked at. Your milage should vary greatly. 
_________________ http://armedliberalinmo.blogspot.com/ Bowers v. DeVito "...there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered." Director of Merchandising, The Liberal Gun Club Happy Donater to the HRC
|
|
| Top |
|
|
GuitarsandGuns
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:44 am |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 2:25 pm Posts: 5828 Location: Afghanistan West
|
MtnMan wrote: I'm suddenly curious to find an old rotary phone and see if it will work with my digital cable phone service. It should My 1910 phone works with magic jack. Just can't dial out, but it rings and you can talk on it. I turned off the electronic ringers on the other phones so there is an actual bell that rings. Quite cool.
_________________ How to Embed a Youtube Video - click here If you live a long life, it is a testament to your friends' self control. Join The LGC
|
|
| Top |
|
|
SwampGrouch
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:48 am |
|
| I can't believe you post this much! |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:07 am Posts: 2837 Location: SW Washington (not DC, the state)
|
MtnMan wrote: Now that that that's off my chest, I'm suddenly curious to find an old rotary phone and see if it will work with my digital cable phone service. THREAD HIJACK If you plugged your existing POTS (Plain Ol' Telephone Service) Touch Tone desk sets into your new system, an otherwise working rotary phone will function as an extension - you'll be able to talk and listen. However, you will not be able to dial with it as your new system uses tone only and doesn't recognize pulse dialing. Digital phones will use the top RJ45 Ethernet plug like a computer, POTS phones will use the bottom RJ11/14 plug.  Note also that the old electro-mechanical ringers draw quite a bit more current than modern electronic ones. You might want to disconnect it. SwampGrouch Member, TCI 
_________________ "There never was a union of church and state which did not bring serious evils to religion." The Right Reverend John England, first Roman Catholic Bishop of Charleston SC, 1825.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
MtnMan
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:28 am |
|
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 9:08 pm Posts: 1497 Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
|
SwampGrouch wrote: MtnMan wrote: Now that that that's off my chest, I'm suddenly curious to find an old rotary phone and see if it will work with my digital cable phone service. THREAD HIJACK Thread further jacked ( jack, get it?) Now I'ma have to find an old rotary phone and hack it to produce DTMF. A counter, some memory, and an encoder chip should do it. Or I could do it all in microprocessor.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
SwampGrouch
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:36 am |
|
| I can't believe you post this much! |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:07 am Posts: 2837 Location: SW Washington (not DC, the state)
|
GuitarsandGuns wrote: It should
My 1910 phone works with magic jack. Just can't dial out, but it rings and you can talk on it. I turned off the electronic ringers on the other phones so there is an actual bell that rings. Quite cool. Ooooo!!! Whatcha got?
_________________ "There never was a union of church and state which did not bring serious evils to religion." The Right Reverend John England, first Roman Catholic Bishop of Charleston SC, 1825.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Antiquus
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:20 am |
|
| I can't believe you post this much! |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 10:44 pm Posts: 2318 Location: Custer's Hometown
|
Trying to get this back on track (futile, I know) the neat revolver trick is the number of ways the grips can be modified. First is just being aware revovlers and autos hold differently, and auto users tend to hold too high on smooth grips (and makes the barrel climb). An auto has a natural hand stop at the beavertail on the grip, necessary to avoid slide bite. A similar thing has been tried on revolvers, but in the end discarded as not necessary to the function of the gun. However revolvers have had grips with finger groves available since for freaking ever.. I have a 6" SS L frame and a 2½" Scandium L frame and an LCR. They all have Hogue grips - the 2 L frames have square butt conversion grips and the LCR comes with a Hogue compact. They all point the same. This despite the huge differences in weight, length and balance. The 2½" L frame came with typical compact S&W grips, great for concealment but I immediately had the same issue you do - that is my hand rode too far up on the grip if I wasn't careful. The Hogue grip fixed that permanently. Very similar is a S&W J frame I have with a S&W knock off of a compact Hogue on it - finger grooves also. Another old and tried and true item is the Tyler T-grip. These also put the natural hold farther down on the grip. They also sell trigger shoes, which help stabilize a long DA pull.
_________________ When only cops have guns, it's called a police state.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
troutkiller
|
Post subject: Re: Revolver vs Semi-auto -An observation Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:58 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:09 am Posts: 492 Location: Round on the ends, hi in the middle
|
BK Grips also makes Tyler-type grips for revolvers. They came in handy on my dear departed Model 12. Being 2mm thinner than other K-frames, it was going to be a tough fit for neoprene grips. That turned out to be a blessing in disguise as the 12 still had the vintage "diamond" grips. My buddy who picked up the revolver from me loved the way the grips felt. So did I. I was once hesitant about Tyler grips (looks), but no more, especially on those vintage S&W's. http://bkgrips.com/
_________________ "Kill the white people" ~ Tyrone Green (Eddie Murphy)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 16 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|  |