As a male, I feel "Cunt" as an anatomical description is awesome. It rolls off the tongue so wonderfully, especially in, uh, heated situations. I realize that other's don't feel the same way as me, or have the same understanding of the public disapproval of the word, so I generally avoid saying it in public.

I think it just sounds so much stronger than "vagina" or "pussy". None of those soft "s" sounds or that medically accurate terminology, it's that old Germanic root of English that covers all those important things like friends, family, anatomy, eating and sleeping and drinking and fucking.

I'm rather torn as to its use as an adjective ("that cunting car!") or as a term to describe folks. I mean, all the cunts I've been closely familiar with have been warm and inviting and made me really happy to be around them. The ujse of it as an adjective generally is not in keeping with this. The people who in American usage might be called cunts? Definitely not. From what I've heard of Aussie and Irish slang, it's meaning varies significantly based on tone.

Fukshot: "cunt juggler" does have a certain ring to it. I have a hunch that the American Congress of OB/GYNs isn't going to be changing to ACCJ anytime soon, though.

CrazyWolf wrote: ACCJ

I'd totally joining the ACCJ I'm stickin' with the union!

Okay Chicago people

Name three streets that rhyme with vagina.

You'd be surprised at how many Yankees are unwilling to say Regina when discussing cities in Alberta....it seems to always come out "Regeena" or "Regna" and do they ever flush when their pronunciation is corrected...
bunch of pussies...

rolandson wrote:You'd be surprised at how many Yankees are unwilling to say Regina when discussing cities in Alberta....it seems to always come out "Regeena" or "Regna" and do they ever flush when their pronunciation is corrected...
bunch of pussies...

rolandson...I bet you're familiar with the pronunciation of Couch Street in Portland. The first time I heard that I cracked up.

mikecallton@house.mi.gov
If anyone would like to email VAGINA to this idiot.
I put "Could you please Help" in the subject line so it wouldn't be auto-deleted. His mailbox is flooded right now.

Thank you for contacting my office.

Your concerns and opinions are very important to me and I try to answer every email I receive personally. Due to the high volume of emails my office has been receiving, we would like to let you know that we have received your email and will be looking into your concerns. It is important for me to be able to personally correspond with all my constituents, and I thank you for your patience. Please be aware that I am unable to immediately respond, and it may take anywhere from a few days to a week for me to get back to you.

Thank you again for contacting me.

Representative Mike Callton

I prefer "Connie".

Bearlaker wrote:mikecallton@house.mi.gov
If anyone would like to email VAGINA to this idiot.
I put "Could you please Help" in the subject line so it wouldn't be auto-deleted. His mailbox is flooded right now.

should have put "A prospective donor"

Edit: sent one myself to him

Dear, Mike

I would like to ask why you believe your religion should be the basis of a law. The U.S. Constitution via the establishment claus forbids this. I would like, as your constituent and explanation of why you think this should be ignored, or otherwise an explanation as to how this is not based on your religion, with a scientific and logical backing.

http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/ ... picks=true

Also, provision d(9)(a) of the bill would amend the current law to ensure that if any listener who hears the word vagina spoken aloud—although it may be the medically correct term for a woman’s reproductive organs—feels any religious objections to such speech, that speech may be curtailed in the interest of preserving the listener’s religious freedom as detailed in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Any other marginally relevant provisions of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution are herein rescinded as needed.

whatdisay about a bunch of pussies??

rolandson wrote:http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/ ... picks=true

Also, provision d(9)(a) of the bill would amend the current law to ensure that if any listener who hears the word vagina spoken aloud—although it may be the medically correct term for a woman’s reproductive organs—feels any religious objections to such speech, that speech may be curtailed in the interest of preserving the listener’s religious freedom as detailed in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Any other marginally relevant provisions of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution are herein rescinded as needed.

whatdisay about a bunch of pussies??

That part of the article is satire.

lemur wrote: That part of the article is satire.

It's Slate...I think the entire article was satirical, certainly the proposed legislative business...

This is beautiful:

http://feministing.com/2012/06/18/pic-of-the-day/

also

I'm so proud to be from Michigan right now.

Okay, Michigan members (am I allowed to say "member" here?). Here's your mission. Bring this exhibit to a museum in your state.

http://www.greatwallofvagina.co.uk/home

I'll pledge $50 toward the cost.