I mean it wouldn't likely affect me much. I don't have a want for a big scary rifle, heck the only reason I bought the 15 round and 25 round magazines I bought was for convenience but to be frank personally I can take the convenience or leave it.
I'm not even particularly hung up on the constitutional end of the argument as something that really gets me. And by that I mean, If society came together in sufficient numbers as to alter the constitution in such a way to reflect their wishes, if I were to disagree who am I to stand in the way of society in such high numbers? I'd disagree but could at least swallow the idea of such a large majority being on the same page.
What's really bothering me is the route to get there. The opposition to this position is arguing based largely on perception, emotion, and suppression of countering ideas.
I could not so easily stomach society coming to such an agreement if it came at the expense of free expression of all viewpoints.
With Emma Gonzalez, the media will completely control the counter points to paint them, and us as all crazy and nothing else. They know kids will emotionally attach themselves to celebrity status so, they will paint her that way. But when media reports those who counter her, they will only post things like these.
http://www.newser.com/story/257052/fake ... vivor.html
The butthole who made the GIF of her tearing up the constitution
http://www.newser.com/story/257055/he-s ... -kids.html
The butthole from Eagles of Death Metal.
The opposition they will report will only be of this type of stuff, so as to paint a picture that the whole of those who disagree, are like these buttholes.
That's my biggest problem with this stuff. Not that people don't see stuff my way, but that they don't get the whole story.