It wasn't for corruption or bribery, but for vehicular violations.
One was Franklin Pierce, who ran over a woman with his horse.
The other was Ulysses S. Grant for speeding in his carriage. He was stopped 2 evenings in a row, by the same DC policeman. The 2nd time, at 13th & M Streets, the cop hauled him in!
From the Washington Post:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/ ... bc33985bd3By Michael S. Rosenwald December 16, 2018
Amid President Trump’s mounting legal problems, TV talking heads and bar-stool philosophers from Boise to Britain have been pondering one of the great mysteries of the U.S. Constitution.
Can the president of the United States actually be indicted? Arrested, handcuffed, the whole deal. Possible?
The prevailing answer is this: Nobody is sure.
But that’s not entirely true.
President Ulysses S. Grant knows — err, knew.
In 1872, while president, Grant was arrested at the corner of 13th and M streets in Washington. This was not a high crime, but it was — at least theoretically speaking — a misdemeanor.
The man who led the North to victory in the Civil War was busted for speeding in his horse-drawn carriage.
The story of his arrest — confirmed a few years ago by Cathy L. Lanier, who was then the District’s police chief — was told in a remarkable but obviously forgotten story in the Sept. 27, 1908, edition of the Washington Evening Star under the headline: “Only Policeman Who Ever Arrested a President.”
That policeman was William H. West, a black man who had fought in the Civil War.
“Since his retirement,” the story said, “he has decided to let the public know the true story of the arrest.”
It begins with Grant’s love of fast horses.
“Gen. Grant was an ardent admirer of a good horse and loved nothing better than to sit behind a pair of spirited animals,” the Star story said. “He was a good driver, and sometimes ‘let them out’ to try their mettle.”
And that’s where Grant, as president, rode into the law.
The police had been receiving complaints of speeding carriages. After a mother and child were run over and badly injured, Officer West was dispatched to investigate. As West spoke to witnesses, another group of speeding carriages headed toward him — including one driven by the president of the United States.
“Policeman West held up his hand for them to stop,” the story said. “Grant was driving a pair of fast steppers and he had some difficulty in halting them, but this he managed to do.”
Grant was a bit testy.
"Well, officer,” he said, “what do you want with me?"
West replied: “I want to inform you, Mr. President, that you are violating the law by speeding along this street. Your fast driving, sir, has set the example for a lot of other gentlemen."
The president apologized, promised it wouldn’t happen again, and galloped away.
But Grant could not curb his need for speed.
The next evening, West was patrolling at the corner of 13th and M streets when the president came barreling through again, this time speeding so fast that it took him an entire block to stop.
Now Grant was cocky and had a “smile on his face,” the Star article said, that made him look like “a schoolboy who had been caught in a guilty act by a teacher.”
He said, “Do you think, officer, that I was violating the speed laws?”
“I do, Mr. President,” West said.
Grant had an excuse for his speeding, not unlike one no doubt being given somewhere right now: He had no idea he had been going so fast.
West was sympathetic but firm.
“I am very sorry, Mr. President, to have to do it,” he said, “for you are the chief of the nation, and I am nothing but a policeman, but duty is duty, sir, and I will have to place you under arrest.”
It’s worth pointing out here that standards of journalism, particularly with quotations, were not as rigorous back then as today, so it’s nearly impossible to know if this is the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help us hot type.
However, Lanier did confirm the arrest, and there are other historical references to it.
Anyway, Grant and several of his speeding buddies also arrested went with West to the police station. The president of the United States was ordered to put up 20 bucks as collateral. A trial was held the next day.
"Thirty-two ladies of the most refined character and surroundings voluntarily came into the court and testified against the drivers,” the Star story said. “The cases were contested bitterly."
The judge imposed “heavy fines” and a “scathing rebuke” to the speeding drivers, who didn’t include the president.
He didn’t show up for court.
The old Evening Star building (of the paper that reported this story in 1908), just across the street from the Old Post Office (now the shit-stain's horribly over-priced tasteless hotel) was re-purposed many years ago as an office building and was used by much of the AntiTrust division of DOJ. It was on the top floor there, working as a contractor, that I met my future wife in 1985. That job's long gone, they tore down the building, saving just the facade, building a new one behind it, but that woman and I are still together!
But what this means is that the Justice Dept guidance (which is not law) may clearly be totally wrong--If you can arrest a sitting President, you can certainly indict one!
BTW, $20 in 1872 was when a gold, Double-Eagle was worth its face value of $20. Today, the gold content alone (without the numismatic value added in) of a Double Eagle is $1245.-- at the current spot gold price of $1287.-- So President Grant forfeited the equivalent of $1245...a damn hefty fine for a speeding ticket! Is it any wonder the judge didn't worry about him not appearing in court?