Another expensive hobby: astronomy

1
Since I turned 50 a couple of weeks ago and had a frustrating experience with my old Orion StarBlast telescope a couple of days later, I decided to finally break down and buy the telescope of my dreams. Behold!

Image


8" Meade LX200-ACF Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope, with full computer control and a 142,000 object preprogrammed into it's GOTO controller.

I've dreamt about having a scope like this for as long as I can remember, and now that I'm older and financially well off I've decided to finally let myself have a nice toy for a change! I also bought a really big eyepeice to go with it - a TeleVue 41mm Panoptic lens, which itself cost more than all of my old telescope gear combined! I'm also going to get more gear, too, especially a nice astro imaging setup. It's time to shoot the stars, baby!

Image
88+ recreational uses of firearms
1 defensive use
0 people injured
0 people killed

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

5
That is very cool. I have a pair of "deep sky" binocs and two refracting telescopes, neither with a motor drive. I sure like looking at stuff even if I have to chase them across the sky. I use the two-volume Celestial Objects for Common Telescopes by The Rev. T.W. Webb.

CDFingers
Image
Image
.
Wave that flag, wave it wide and high.
Summer time gonna come and go, my, oh, my. My, my, my.

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

7
So nice! Things have really changed for amateur astronomers in the last 20+ years. I have an old, original Meade ETX (90mm) with some upgrades, but nothing like the newest ones. And an old 10" Meade S-C that's a PITA to use and weighs about 2 hernias. But those Televue lenses are incredible! Heavy, expensive, but WOW! 80 or more degrees of viewing! (Update: I just remembered the name of the guy who invented it, Al Nagler. Arrogant fellow but knows his stuff.

See if you can get a Thousand Oaks sun filter as well. And if you feel really, REALLY like wasting money one of those "hydrogen alpha" sun filters! I've only looked through them but you can see the solar flares with them.

Did you get some kind of camera back to go with it? I used my old, old Minolta adapter with my Sony Alpha SLR to shoot the 2017 eclipse, with my old Thousand Oaks filter. We didn't get totality but here's what I shot at the maximum coverage:
BestEclipsePic.jpg
Last edited by YankeeTarheel on Sun Jul 21, 2019 10:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The upper class: keeps all of the money, pays none of the taxes. The middle class: pays all of the taxes, does all of the work. The poor are there...just to scare the shit out of the middle class."--George Carlin

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

9
highdesert wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:37 am Very nice, you're a serious star gazer. Can you use it at your home or is there too much light pollution?
Was.
Light pollution's terrible here, plus lots of trees...and my gear is 20 years old or more. But eclipses are really fun to shoot.
"The upper class: keeps all of the money, pays none of the taxes. The middle class: pays all of the taxes, does all of the work. The poor are there...just to scare the shit out of the middle class."--George Carlin

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

12
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 10:09 am
highdesert wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:37 am Very nice, you're a serious star gazer. Can you use it at your home or is there too much light pollution?
Was.
Light pollution's terrible here, plus lots of trees...and my gear is 20 years old or more. But eclipses are really fun to shoot.
I have the same problem: a yard full of trees, and terrible light pollution. About 8 or 9 on the Bortle scale. But that's much less limiting now with this telescope since it has a GOTO function. I may not be able to star hop to find things (hard to follow the stars when you can't even see them in the first place) but once I got the scope aligned the other night I was able to tell it to take me on a tour of the sky and it dutifully slewed around and pointed itself for me. I saw more things in one night than I've ever seen with a manual telescope! I have an Orion Ultrablock light pollution filter, too, and that helps a bit, though not as much as you'd hope.
88+ recreational uses of firearms
1 defensive use
0 people injured
0 people killed

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

13
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:31 am Did you get some kind of camera back to go with it? I used my old, old Minolta adapter with my Sony Alpha SLR to shoot the 2017 eclipse, with my old Thousand Oaks filter. We didn't get totality but here's what I shot at the maximum coverage:

I've got a Canon 50D that I can use. Right now it's mounted on a Sky Watcher Sky Adventurer tracking mount with a 100-400mm zoom lens. I might try prime focus photography with in and the new scope, but I'm also looking at getting a dedicated deep sky imager of some sort. No idea what brand or model to get, though, as I'm still reading up on that.
88+ recreational uses of firearms
1 defensive use
0 people injured
0 people killed

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

14
Eris wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:51 pm
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:31 am Did you get some kind of camera back to go with it? I used my old, old Minolta adapter with my Sony Alpha SLR to shoot the 2017 eclipse, with my old Thousand Oaks filter. We didn't get totality but here's what I shot at the maximum coverage:

I've got a Canon 50D that I can use. Right now it's mounted on a Sky Watcher Sky Adventurer tracking mount with a 100-400mm zoom lens. I might try prime focus photography with in and the new scope, but I'm also looking at getting a dedicated deep sky imager of some sort. No idea what brand or model to get, though, as I'm still reading up on that.
If your 'scope has goto tracking, you can get a camera mount to go on top of it and track with it. I did that with the 1999 eclipse but with the primitive s/w and h/w it was a lot trickier. Still, as long as the 'scope tracked the sun, so did the camera on top.
"The upper class: keeps all of the money, pays none of the taxes. The middle class: pays all of the taxes, does all of the work. The poor are there...just to scare the shit out of the middle class."--George Carlin

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

15
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:55 pm
Eris wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:51 pm
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:31 am Did you get some kind of camera back to go with it? I used my old, old Minolta adapter with my Sony Alpha SLR to shoot the 2017 eclipse, with my old Thousand Oaks filter. We didn't get totality but here's what I shot at the maximum coverage:

I've got a Canon 50D that I can use. Right now it's mounted on a Sky Watcher Sky Adventurer tracking mount with a 100-400mm zoom lens. I might try prime focus photography with in and the new scope, but I'm also looking at getting a dedicated deep sky imager of some sort. No idea what brand or model to get, though, as I'm still reading up on that.
If your 'scope has goto tracking, you can get a camera mount to go on top of it and track with it. I did that with the 1999 eclipse but with the primitive s/w and h/w it was a lot trickier. Still, as long as the 'scope tracked the sun, so did the camera on top.
I've done piggy back photography before with my StarBlast, but I don't feel a need to do it with the new scope since I have a dedicated tracking mount for the camera itself.
88+ recreational uses of firearms
1 defensive use
0 people injured
0 people killed

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

19
Eris wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 3:20 pm
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:55 pm
Eris wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:51 pm
YankeeTarheel wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:31 am Did you get some kind of camera back to go with it? I used my old, old Minolta adapter with my Sony Alpha SLR to shoot the 2017 eclipse, with my old Thousand Oaks filter. We didn't get totality but here's what I shot at the maximum coverage:

I've got a Canon 50D that I can use. Right now it's mounted on a Sky Watcher Sky Adventurer tracking mount with a 100-400mm zoom lens. I might try prime focus photography with in and the new scope, but I'm also looking at getting a dedicated deep sky imager of some sort. No idea what brand or model to get, though, as I'm still reading up on that.
If your 'scope has goto tracking, you can get a camera mount to go on top of it and track with it. I did that with the 1999 eclipse but with the primitive s/w and h/w it was a lot trickier. Still, as long as the 'scope tracked the sun, so did the camera on top.
I've done piggy back photography before with my StarBlast, but I don't feel a need to do it with the new scope since I have a dedicated tracking mount for the camera itself.
Now that is seriously cool, Eris. Long before I started shooting paper I enjoyed shooting the heavens.
"The upper class: keeps all of the money, pays none of the taxes. The middle class: pays all of the taxes, does all of the work. The poor are there...just to scare the shit out of the middle class."--George Carlin

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

20
Today I got a laptop to run the scope. And it occurs to me that once I get a decent imager with computer control on it I can:

- set up telescope
- connect the imager
- hook up both to the laptop
- connect to my home wifi
- go inside to my desktop
- connect to the laptop remotely
- WATCH THE FREAKING STARS FROM AIR CONDITIONING!

BWA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!
88+ recreational uses of firearms
1 defensive use
0 people injured
0 people killed

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

21
Why not just run the USB cable with extensions all the way to your desktop? Then it's just one PC running it all!

Maybe you can even run it to FaceBook as a "live camera" so we can watch the stars with you!
"The upper class: keeps all of the money, pays none of the taxes. The middle class: pays all of the taxes, does all of the work. The poor are there...just to scare the shit out of the middle class."--George Carlin

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

22
YankeeTarheel wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 10:31 pm Why not just run the USB cable with extensions all the way to your desktop? Then it's just one PC running it all!

Maybe you can even run it to FaceBook as a "live camera" so we can watch the stars with you!
I'd need about a 150 feet of USB cable for that, and serial cable too.

Live camera feed could be interesting, though I'd probably use Twitch since I dont' do FB.
88+ recreational uses of firearms
1 defensive use
0 people injured
0 people killed

Re: Another expensive hobby: astronomy

23
Eris wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 10:37 pm
YankeeTarheel wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 10:31 pm Why not just run the USB cable with extensions all the way to your desktop? Then it's just one PC running it all!

Maybe you can even run it to FaceBook as a "live camera" so we can watch the stars with you!
I'd need about a 150 feet of USB cable for that, and serial cable too.

Live camera feed could be interesting, though I'd probably use Twitch since I dont' do FB.
That would call for Cat5 + and balens to handle it. Of course it depends on where you place the 'scope and where your desktop is.
"The upper class: keeps all of the money, pays none of the taxes. The middle class: pays all of the taxes, does all of the work. The poor are there...just to scare the shit out of the middle class."--George Carlin

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron