2024 and all that.

1
The US has long found that dealing with autocratic governments can be practical, productive and profitable.

History shows us that it is very much possible to have democratically elected federal executive and legislative bodies that can also be autocratic.

History has also shown us that even when it comes down to a US autocratic President vs the SCOTUS the President can simply tell SCOTUS to call in their army while he will call his as in Wochester v. Georgia and Ex parte Merryman where the President simply ignored a Supreme Court Decision.

Hitler was very popular for a long time and had support not just from within Germany but even in the US. Henry Ford and Lindberg and Joseph Kennedy and Lady Astor and Father Charles Coughlin as well as US companies like Ford and General Motors and Dow Chemical and Coca-Cola and Kodak and IBM all worked with and profited from the Nazi Regime.

Mussolini was popular both at home and abroad with vast support from the major European and US companies and Governments.

It's unlikely that there would be a US Civil War again BUT the likelihood of a Fascist Autocratic Government or a Military Coup are far, far higher. The question is rather will the transition to the Autocratic Fascist State be a relatively peaceful transition as happened in Japan, Italy and Germany rather than the Civil War scenario as in Spain?

And if as is most likely the transition to the Autocratic Fascist State is peaceful will the Military stand by and simply accept the status change from Democracy to Autocracy as happened in Germany, and Italy? In Japan it was the Military that instigated and created the transition to the Fascist Autocratic State by foreign intervention but again the transition was relatively peaceful with only a few key players being assassinated. Such Foreign intervention does not seem likely in the current US situation, so Germany and Italy are more likely scenarios.

An autocratic command economy has many advantages for business. Troublesome things like fair labor practices or unions or worker safety laws or environmental laws can simply be forgotten when convenient. There would be no messy things like demonstrations or strikes or slowdowns.

Elections would be far less disruptive and things like January 6th. would simply not be allowed.

There is absolutely no reason Trump or another proto autocrat would or needs to instigate a civil war. Again, look at the history of Germany, Italy the USSR or Japan.

Nazi Germany was the world leader in implementing the 40-hour work week, guaranteed retirement and pension, annual paid vacations with government created and supported vacation locations. Germany was a world leader in youth education and entitlement.

There would be no reparations and lots of new jobs and lower fuel prices and for those who were party members a great life and future.

The US under an Autocratic Dictatorship would be Nazi Germany in the late 1920s and 1930s, prosperous, peaceful, full of hope.

But the lesson of the Night of the Long Knives as well as the Japanese political assassinations of the early 1930s should also be remembered. Potential challengers to the autocrat take heed.

It's very unlikely that a coup similar to January 6th. though would have any chance unless and until the conditions can be close enough to possibly be called Constitutional.

First the legal means to change from our current messy democratic republic to an autocratic fascist state are already in place or being put in place.
The tool is simply the Constitutionally Created Electoral College.
From Article2 US Constitution.

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.

The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
The individual States can decide who is a member of their Electoral College Delegation and there is no requirement that the popular vote even be considered.

Currently the effort in many States is to curtail the popular vote and to design districts to maintain control of voting.

If successful, the two-prong assault of limiting the popular vote and control of the Electoral Delegation means that in 2024 the outcome of the Presidential Election will be determined by the will of the individual State Legislatures rather than the votes.

But wait, there's more.

The same States that are involved above are also modifying both who gets to vote and who gets to count the votes.

So far it is all legal and Constitutional and so the most likely outcome would be a Legal, Constitutional coup.

The question then is if it does meet the Constitutional challenge, will the Military that has sworn to uphold the US Constitution oppose the coup?

If the US Military decides to take-sides then no civilian group has the capability to oppose them. If the Military decides to not intervene then the US will simply become an autocratic fascist State.

And business will simply prosper.
Last edited by sig230 on Wed Jan 19, 2022 11:45 am, edited 5 times in total.
To be vintage it must be older than me!
Stories coming to you from Deep South Texas!
The next gun I buy will be the next to last gun I ever buy. PROMISE!

Re: 2024 and all that.

2
Ms. Cooper and I are watching 2022 very closely to see how serious we need to be about our escape plan. For real. I have portable skills. It would sadden me to no end to leave. To paraphrase Dan Carlin (if I remember correctly) I really believe in the tourist brochure of America. I've always known its warts, but believe it is the kind of system one can keep moving forward in. Lately I'm thinking the game is up. I don't need to have everything my way. I just need to know the deck isn't stacked. I'm starting to wonder if democracy can survive Citizens United + loss of fairness doctrine + social media + the aggressive backlash to a black president (don't kid yourself, the kindling has been piling up bit 2008 was the match) + [add your pet anti democratic factor here]...

Please let me be wrong. But yeah a constitutional coup is my worst nightmare. Drip, drip, drip.

Re: 2024 and all that.

4
cooper wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:41 am And because we are a 2A supporting group, it's worth noting that in the end our guns can't save us from this particular form of tyrrany. You may now throw rotten vegetables at me.
You know how many pro-2A people would actually admit that? Hats off to you for staying so well grounded in reality in a time when glimpses of reality are fleeting.
“I think there’s a right-wing conspiracy to promote the idea of a left-wing conspiracy”

Re: 2024 and all that.

5
All potentially true. It's also true that our republic is designed to be run by the minority--everything points to that design. But it's also designed to respond to a majority. I'll continue to get out the vote locally and to speak progressive truths in public places. Not the best of times, but we might see an arrested orange spirochete before too long, and we'll definitely hear from the Jan 6 Committee every week with damning evidence all the through November. Go, team!

on edit, a republic is a representative democracy. A republic works best when representation is accurate and proportional. We can make that so.

CDFingers
Image
Image
.
If I had a gun for every ace I've drawn
I could arm a town the size of Zhytomyr

Re: 2024 and all that.

6
sig 230 great piece. You did leave out one significant name from the US supporters of Hitler, Wall Street banker Prescott Bush, father of H.W. Bush and grandfather of G.W.Bush. The article did point out that he personally didn't show support for Hitler's policies, he did do businesses with Germany to the point the bank was seized by the US Government in 1942.

How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power

In these times it's fitting that we can quote the mob accountant Otto Berman "Nothing personal, it's just business."
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-Huxley
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis Brandeis,

Re: 2024 and all that.

7
Yes, we've had strong and weak presidents and SCOTUS has been strong and weak over the centuries, just like Congress. Because the Constitution doesn't give SCOTUS the power to declare laws unconsitutional, the court is dependent on the executive and legislative branches recognizing that power as they defined in their Marbury vs Madison decision.

I look at history as eras, the 19th century was a period of industrialization and colonization. The early 20th century was the era of empires and colonies, then WWI. Then communism, fascism and WWII and the first Cold War. By the 1980s the first Cold War ended and we were into the age of Muslim terrorism which is ongoing and it seems we're into a second Cold War with Russia and China.

Hindsight is always the best, we now see clearly the fascist and communist eras, but things about Muslim terrorism and later are less clear. The old creaky Constitution is still a good guide for the road ahead. I'm not convinced we're headed towards totalitarianism, there will always be loud demagogues like Trump that will make people think we're headed that way, but we're not. In front of us is dead time historically speaking, we need to have a macro view of time to clearly see it. We will survive.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Re: 2024 and all that.

9
wings wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:24 pm Behind every autocrat, there's a privileged elite oligarchy propping him up.

It's always a man, too.
More completely, a privileged elite oligarchy making pots of money, much from taxpayers somehow.

CDFingers
Image
Image
.
If I had a gun for every ace I've drawn
I could arm a town the size of Zhytomyr

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests

cron